nanog mailing list archives
Re: rfc 1918?
From: "Ron Buchalski" <rbuchals () hotmail com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:40:39
One may argue that, if all your border peers ARE filtering RFC1918 addresses inbound and outbound, they'll take care of your misbehavior.
-rb
From: woods () weird com (Greg A. Woods) Reply-To: woods () weird com (Greg A. Woods) To: nanog () merit edu (North America Network Operators Group Mailing List) Subject: Re: rfc 1918? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 02:55:56 -0500 (EST)
<snip>
Can you please try to find at least one even minor technical argumentfor not filtering RFC-1918 addresses before you try again to give this idea any more credit?
_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Current thread:
- Re: rfc 1918?, (continued)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Ariel Biener (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? SMcGrath (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Rancken (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? SMcGrath (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? bill manning (Feb 24)
- RE: rfc 1918? Mark Borchers (Feb 24)
- RE: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Scott Francis (Feb 24)
- RE: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- RE: rfc 1918? Chris Davis (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Ron Buchalski (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? SMcGrath (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? bill manning (Feb 25)