nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network for Sale
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:25:51 -0500
In message <038901c09d22$d2736280$7c4cf9d1 () geeksparadise com>, "davids" writes:
And how does "delay" differ from RTT, except for the obvious constant factor? --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smbThe RTT is the sum of two delays. There is no simple way to separate the two. In general, you don't even know what path the return packets are taking. This same problem applies to trying to measure packet loss and using the results to influence routing decisions.
I understand that, of course, but since the return path is used for the ACKs that clock the transmissions, I suspect that it's a fair approximation. Paul's response to my posting was quite fair, in fact. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- RE: Network for Sale, (continued)
- RE: Network for Sale Jason Lixfeld (Feb 24)
- re: Network for sale Troy Corbin (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Paul A Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Paul A Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Philippe Strauss (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Paul A Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale davids (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: Network for Sale Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 24)