nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
From: J Bacher <jb () jbacher com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:29:16 -0600 (CST)
Voila, I think that this is what my problem was. Like I said, the information _was_ out there, it was just not intuitively available. So the upgrade will scare some people off, if they don't manage to find it.
You are in an unenviable position. But in support of ISC, this problem is listed in FAQ which is reachable through www.isc.org.
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded, (continued)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Pete Ehlke (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Pim van Riezen (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Derek J. Balling (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded mdevney (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Pete Ehlke (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Pete Ehlke (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Jim Mercer (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Pim van Riezen (Feb 24)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded J Bacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Adam McKenna (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Bill Woodcock (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Kevin Oberman (Feb 24)