nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using unallocated address space
From: Philip Smith <pfs () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:53:55 +1000
At 22:56 12/02/2001 -0800, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Mon, 12 February 2001, John Fraizer wrote: > Any time a network is caught announcing non-allocated address space, the > registry should bill them accordingly. If they refuse to pay, the > registry should yank their ASN. That would be strong encouragement to do > the right thing. Other than making it difficult for people to figure out WHOIS using that ASN, "yanking" an ASN's registration has little practical effect. You can use an un-allocated ASN almost as easily as using an un-allocated address block.
And announcing both unallocated address space and unallocated AS space will mean an entry in my little summary which I send out every week to RIPE NCC, ARIN and APNIC mailing lists...
I've see these: Network Origin AS Description 39.96.40.224/30 14408 iCAIR 50.198.0.0/16 2548 Digital Express Group, Inc. 91.16.23.0/24 11770 Net56 103.22.7.0/24 9768 PubNet (Korea Telecom)And the large amount of private and unallocated ASes has already been mentioned on the list this week...
Someone is watching, it's another issue what to do about it, if anything can be done at all...
philip --
Current thread:
- Using unallocated address space Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- Re: Using unallocated address space Philip Smith (Feb 24)
- Re: Using unallocated address space Hank Nussbacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Using unallocated address space Hank Nussbacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Using unallocated address space michael thomas guldan (Feb 24)
- Re: Using unallocated address space Alan Hannan (Feb 24)
- Re: Using unallocated address space Hank Nussbacher (Feb 24)
- Re: Using unallocated address space Alan Hannan (Feb 24)
- Re: Using unallocated address space Omachonu Ogali (Feb 24)
- Re: Using unallocated address space Philip Smith (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Using unallocated address space Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- RE: Using unallocated address space Brett L. Hawn (Feb 24)
- Re: Using unallocated address space smd (Feb 24)