nanog mailing list archives
Re: Social responsibility (censorship?) on NANOG?
From: John Fraizer <nanog () Overkill EnterZone Net>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:53:54 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Susan Harris wrote:
John, your forwarded message went to nanog-post, not to the NANOG list. nanog-post is simply the list of people who are subscribed (allowed) to send to the NANOG list, and therefore nanog-post doesn't go anywhere. People that are on the NANOG list also have to belong to the nanog-post list if they want to send messages to the nanog list. This is explained on the web: http://www.nanog.org/email.html See section 2. Susan Harris, Ph.D. Merit Network/Univ. of Mich.
Susan, The only way my message was going to nanog-post is if the MTA there at MERIT is mutating them on their way in. Here is what has been sent out. ATTEMPT #1: Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:12:42 -0500 (EST) From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net> To: nanog () merit edu cc: spam () wcom com, abuse () wcom com bcc: Jason.Weeks () wcom Com Subject: WCOM SPAM!!! : Lower Cost T-1/ T-3 lines from WorldCom/UUNET for ISP's. Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102061402350.8783-100000 () Overkill EnterZone Net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII ATTEMPT #2: Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 00:41:53 -0500 (EST) From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net> To: nanog () merit edu Subject: WCOM SPAM!!! : Lower Cost T-1/ T-3 lines from WorldCom/UUNET for ISP's. Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102070041240.20944-100000 () Overkill EnterZone Net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII (Unsubscribed from NANOG and NANOG-POST, resubscribed with email@FQDN) ATTEMPT #3: Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:22:46 -0500 (EST) From: John Fraizer <nanog () Overkill EnterZone Net> To: nanog () merit edu Subject: WCOM SPAM!!! : Lower Cost T-1/ T-3 lines from WorldCom/UUNET for ISP's. (fwd) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102072222060.12448-100000 () Overkill EnterZone Net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII As you can see, every message was sent to nanog () merit edu, just as always. I'm not the only one seeing this problem and I'm pretty sure that we all understand how the mailing list works. We've all been active for years, even prior to there being such thing as "nanog-post" so, something is happening on that end that shouldn't be. I thought I should bring it to the attention of the powers that be. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
Current thread:
- RE: Social responsibility (censorship?) on NANOG? John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Social responsibility (censorship?) on NANOG? John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: Social responsibility (censorship?) on NANOG? John Fraizer (Feb 24)
- Re: Social responsibility (censorship?) on NANOG? Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 24)