nanog mailing list archives
Re: /24's run amuck?
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () att net il>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 08:34:41 +0200
At 00:18 07/02/01 -0600, Basil Kruglov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:03:23AM -0500, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:20:34PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote: > > > > > Almost time to bring back the satanic filters. > > > > bring back? > > Speaking of satan(ic filters)... :P > > What size routing table does verio carry? :PNeighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd129.250.XXX.X 4 2914 837677 34157 4729315 0 0 3w2d 84420
From the Oregon route server the 2 largest route tables are from: 193.0.0.56 4 3333 627090 11888 10563581 0 0 1d23h 100347 203.62.252.21 4 1221 594894 11886 10563581 0 0 06:05:10 111576 That is RIPE NCC and Telstra. -Hank
-Basil
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG] /24's run amuck?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [NANOG] /24's run amuck? Hank Nussbacher (Feb 24)
- Message not available
- Re: /24's run amuck? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Danny McPherson (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Danny McPherson (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? James Aldridge (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Josh Richards (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Basil Kruglov (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Hank Nussbacher (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? William Allen Simpson (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Basil Kruglov (Feb 24)
- Re: /24's run amuck? Randy Bush (Feb 24)