nanog mailing list archives
Re: Automated DLR conflict detection
From: mike harrison <meuon () highertech net>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 22:14:54 -0500 (EST)
Sean said:
(can't) figure out why people want a CCIE to run their Juniper routers.
Unlike MS-Something certification, CCIE certification is tough enough and practical enough that the annointed ones are often proven to be useful in any situation. Although I am an old *nix/Linux routing nutcase, I work with a young sponge that just got his CCIE and I am impressed with the foundation he has and his ability to apply it to a wide variety of equipment and scenerios. Should you find yourself driving around Chattanooga in a "stealth backhoe", even at 3am... beware of the rednecks living next door to the fiber. :) .~. meuon () geeklabs com /V\ // \\ recycled thoughts and random electrons = email /( )\ ^`~'^
Current thread:
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection, (continued)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection David Lesher (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Howard C. Berkowitz (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Jake Khuon (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection scott (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Jesper Skriver (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection EA Louie (Dec 31)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Stephen Sprunk (Dec 31)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection mike harrison (Dec 30)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection James (Dec 30)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection EA Louie (Dec 31)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection mike harrison (Dec 31)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 29)