nanog mailing list archives
Re: Policy Routing
From: "Travis Pugh" <tdp () discombobulated net>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 01:54:46 -0400
----- Original Message ----- From: <jlewis () lewis org> Subject: Re: Policy Routing
I've had the same sort of thing proposed. If the customer knows in advance that you're going to send all their traffic through your cheapest peer/transit path available, what's the problem? They get what they pay for...and for this sort of service, they'd obviously be paying noticably less than best path routed customers.
full disclosure, no problem. I've never personally seen a sales rep go in and disclose something like this, and the original message was worded in such a way ("[my] upper management has proposed that I route company X's Internet traffic via a specific NSP ..") that did not indicate the customer had any idea what was being proposed. -travis
Current thread:
- Policy Routing Jeff Cates (Aug 26)
- Re: Policy Routing John Fraizer (Aug 26)
- Re: Policy Routing Travis Pugh (Aug 26)
- Re: Policy Routing jlewis (Aug 26)
- Re: Policy Routing Travis Pugh (Aug 26)
- Re: Policy Routing Travis Pugh (Aug 26)
- Re: Policy Routing John Fraizer (Aug 26)
- RE: Policy Routing Przemyslaw Karwasiecki (Aug 26)
- RE: Policy Routing Jeff Cates (Aug 26)
- RE: Policy Routing Randy Bush (Aug 26)
- RE: Policy Routing Przemyslaw Karwasiecki (Aug 26)
- Re: Policy Routing Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)
- RE: Policy Routing John Fraizer (Aug 26)
- Re: Policy Routing John Fraizer (Aug 26)
- RE: Policy Routing John Fraizer (Aug 26)
- Re: Policy Routing jlewis (Aug 26)
- RE: Policy Routing Przemyslaw Karwasiecki (Aug 26)