nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi-homing fixes
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:51:15 -0700
Now on the other hand by saying "and if it's smaller then a /20 you will be filtered" you cause undue pressure on people to "spin" their designs in ways to show that they can use a /20 and get the allocation from ARIN directly.
you mean not use nat? should i be broken-hearted?
The whole problem seems to me to be a lack of a micro-allocation policy, and an agreement from providers that they will not filter that space.
judicious use of this might be helpful. the problem is the 'judge' in judicious. randy
Current thread:
- Re: multi-homing fixes, (continued)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Christopher A. Woodfield (Aug 25)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Alex Bligh (Aug 25)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Howard C. Berkowitz (Aug 25)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 25)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Andreas Plesner Jacobsen - Tiscali (Aug 25)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Alex Bligh (Aug 25)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Patrick Greenwell (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Steve Noble (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Steve Noble (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Steve Noble (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Brian Whalen (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Steve Noble (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Paul Schultz (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Hal Snyder (Aug 25)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Dmitri Krioukov (Aug 27)