nanog mailing list archives

Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...)


From: Greg Maxwell <gmaxwell () martin fl us>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:37:09 -0400 (EDT)


On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, John Kristoff wrote:


Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
If NAPs do not support jumbos, then end systems will never support them.

Many end systems will never support jumbo frames, period.  There are
lots of 10/100 Mb/s ethernet hosts that will not ever be upgraded.

While not a standard feature, many 100mbit nics support jumbo on
full-duplex links and some 100tx switches do as well.

Certainly.  In a nutshell, it might be best to take steps to avoid
fragmentation elsewhere in the network.  Perhaps a rule of thumb that
should be stressed is to use jumbo frames if you know for sure the other
end system(s) support it, otherwise default to 1500.

Path MTU discovery works fine. (except for broken firewalls) Your
complaint about end systems never supporting jumbos is a moot point
because if neither end supports them, then PMTU discovery isn't even an
issue.



Current thread: