![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Definition of a burstable circuit
From: "Kevin Gannon" <kevin () gannons net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:22:56 -0000 (GMT)
My view matches yours but certainly I know that this would not be shared amoung my own work mates. Its the Telco World Vs IP Junkies story all over again. Maybe you should play with there heads and ask them how they manage ABR ;-). Regards, Kevin
Without getting into a religious debate, I need some consensus for a problem that I am having regarding the definition of a burstable circuit. In my view of the world, a burstable circuit is defined as one where the customer can send us as much data as they would like (for example, an entire DS3's worth on a consistent basis), and we would bill them for usage above the contracted amount via some method (we use 90th percentile reporting) In someone else's view inside the company, the customer should be prohibited from sending above the contracted rate for any extended period of time by policing at the ATM layer. Both views are viable, but I believe (nearly religously) that the former view is correct. Any input would be appreciated. PS. These views are my own and do not represent those of the company, even though I'm sending from my work email :)
Current thread:
- Definition of a burstable circuit Stanley, Jon (Aug 22)
- Re: Definition of a burstable circuit Andy Dills (Aug 22)
- Re: Definition of a burstable circuit Jim Mercer (Aug 22)
- Re: Definition of a burstable circuit Patrick Greenwell (Aug 22)
- Re: Definition of a burstable circuit Alex Bligh (Aug 22)
- Re: Definition of a burstable circuit Alex Bligh (Aug 22)
- Re: Definition of a burstable circuit Alex Bligh (Aug 22)
- Re: Definition of a burstable circuit Kevin Gannon (Aug 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Definition of a burstable circuit Youse, Chuck (Aug 22)
- Re: Definition of a burstable circuit Andy Dills (Aug 22)