Re: MPLS VPNs or not?

[Andy Walden <andy () tigerteam net>]

On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
> I think it's pretty well known that the point you mention is FUD.  Besides,
> it's not really intended to be 'multiple tables' with multiple instances of
> routing processes.. it's an indexed table run by the same routing process.

Logic says that not seeing the routes at all, a la layer-2 tunnels, is
going to scale *better* then having your routers deal with them at all.

Less routes/resources=greater scalability.

andy