nanog mailing list archives
Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast
From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick () cybernothing org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, John Fraizer wrote:
That is certainly *a* point of differentiation, however if the goal of these "basement dual-homers" is to not suffer downtime due to the outage of a single provider(much like the organizations that "matter"), all the responsiveness in the world from a provider whose circuit to one of the "basement dual-homers" which has failed isn't going to prevent them from being down, is it?Patrick, it's all in being able to inform YOUR customers.
John, from a customer perspective it's all about staying UP.
Current thread:
- FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Sean Donelan (Aug 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Sean Donelan (Aug 29)
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Brian Whalen (Aug 29)
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Patrick Greenwell (Aug 29)
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Brian Whalen (Aug 29)
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 29)
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Brian Whalen (Aug 29)
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Patrick Greenwell (Aug 29)
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast John Fraizer (Aug 30)
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Patrick Greenwell (Aug 30)
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Brian (Aug 30)
- RE: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Greg Pendergrass (Aug 30)
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Brian (Aug 30)
- RE: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast E.B. Dreger (Aug 30)
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Patrick Greenwell (Aug 30)
- Re: FIBER CUT: Dallas to West Coast Patrick Greenwell (Aug 30)