nanog mailing list archives

Re: California PUC orders outage notification


From: Brian Russo <brusso () phys hawaii edu>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 04:26:45 -1000


On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 11:00:32AM -0800, Roeland Meyer wrote:
From: Bora Akyol [mailto:akyol () akyol org]

I don't understand why they don't go to planned blackouts instead of 
unplanned blackouts. This may actually drive the demand down 
and price 
with it. Plus maybe the population would decline with people 
migrating 
to South Dakota and all (for those of you that are not living 
in the SF 
Bay Area, S.D. has been advertising extensively on the radio 
as a good 
place to do business with ample energy).

The argument against such planned blackouts are, Crypts, Bloods, F-troop, et
al. (gangs/looters, for those whom aren't familiar) IOW, physical security.
Numerous blackouts have proven that social predators take advantage of
situations where no one can see them, the power is out, and the police are
otherwise occupied.

conversely, it gives everyone
(homeowners, police, private security, noc monkies, et al)
a chance to plan accordingly.

OTOH, if you go with unplanned blackouts..
its not that difficult for organized thieves to use diffused
lookouts communicating via radio/cell/pcs/sms with their buddies
who just drive in a few pickups/vans and scoop away the stuff
when the lights go out..

-- 
Brian Russo      <brusso () phys hawaii edu>
Debian/GNU Linux <wolfie () debian org> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member"    <wolfie () lpsg org>   http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-




Current thread: