nanog mailing list archives
RE: black hat .cn networks
From: Alex Bligh <alex () alex org uk>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 23:26:54 +0100
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:How quickly can CN be firewalled anyway?As quickly as you can write route-map filters
I just love the way (some) Americans bleat about their supposed constitutional rights to have their packets passed between any given pair of networks, but (perhaps others) are quite happy to route-map out entire subcontinents on the basis there might be a few (i.e. statistically insignificant number of) trouble makers there... Somehow I just can't imagine someone suggesting AOL / Earthlink (& I've seen plenty of 'interesting' packets from there) are blackholed for the same reason would get away with this on NANOG. -- Alex Bligh Personal Capacity
Current thread:
- Re: black hat .cn networks, (continued)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Gary E. Miller (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks John Fraizer (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Mark Mentovai (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Steve Schaefer (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks scott w (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Roeland Meyer (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Jim Mercer (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks k claffy (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Alex Bligh (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks mdevney (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Mike Leber (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Brett Frankenberger (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks k claffy (Apr 30)