nanog mailing list archives
Re: Custom Wireless Solution
From: John Kristoff <jtk () depaul edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:52:41 -0500
Mike Schoenecker wrote:
if one is prone to be paranoia, using both [1] and [2] probably makes sense.
Except that it is currently impractical for many sites since it requires an entirely Cisco end-to-end shop including the Cisco (or Microsoft's) RADIUS server. John
Current thread:
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution, (continued)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Wojtek Zlobicki (Apr 22)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Dominic J. Eidson (Apr 22)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Mohan Sundar (Apr 23)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Simon Lockhart (Apr 23)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution poptix (Apr 29)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Lincoln Dale (Apr 23)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Mohan Sundar (Apr 23)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Eric Whitehill (Apr 23)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Miles Fidelman (Apr 23)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Charles Scott (Apr 23)
- RE: Custom Wireless Solution Mike Schoenecker (Apr 25)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution John Kristoff (Apr 25)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Charles Sprickman (Apr 25)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution John Kristoff (Apr 25)
- RE: Custom Wireless Solution Roeland Meyer (Apr 25)
- Re: Custom Wireless Solution Steve Sobol (Apr 30)