nanog mailing list archives
Re: Channelized STM-1
From: Jesper Skriver <jesper () skriver dk>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 18:35:18 +0200
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 10:41:29AM +0200, Arnold Nipper wrote:
Jesper, thanks for spotting at this. So ... On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:36:28AM +0200, Jesper Skriver wrote:On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 09:43:29PM +0200, Arnold Nipper wrote:Two questions concerning channelized STM-1:Which significant depend on what you want to do, explain in more detail, or you won't get a good answer.... here is what I plan to do: I want to install at our premises an STM-1 line and connect this to an channelized STM-1 interface. Via the channels (E3, E1, nxE1) I would like to connect customers. Questions are: Do I have to order a "special" E3 (or E1) if I connect this customer to the channelized STM-1? Or is this fully transparent? (which I would expect to be).
It's fully transparent, the SDH provider will 'do the magic'
Second Q: which type of gear do you recommend/have experience with?
To my knowledge, no channelized STM-1 interface exist which support E3 and E1 at the same time, PA-MC-STM1 from Cisco only support E1 (and channelized E1). /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: FreeBSD committer @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
Current thread:
- Channelized STM-1 Arnold Nipper (Apr 11)
- Re: Channelized STM-1 Jesper Skriver (Apr 12)
- Re: Channelized STM-1 Arnold Nipper (Apr 14)
- Re: Channelized STM-1 Jesper Skriver (Apr 14)
- Re: Channelized STM-1 Arnold Nipper (Apr 14)
- Re: Channelized STM-1 Jesper Skriver (Apr 12)