nanog mailing list archives
RE: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20)
From: Vijay Gill <vijay () umbc edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 23:37:23 -0400
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001 alex () yuriev com wrote:
No, I am talking about Junipers PR#13233. Your friendly Juniper Systems Engineer should be very glad to explain to you what exactly that means.
Thanks for sending the PR, and while I don't see a need for it, it may be useful in some cases. Thats not a bug per se though, its an implementation detail ;) /vijay
Current thread:
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20), (continued)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Matt Zimmerman (Apr 12)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Craig Partridge (Apr 12)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Matt Zimmerman (Apr 12)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Matt Zimmerman (Apr 12)
- RE: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Richard A. Steenbergen (Apr 11)
- RE: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Kavi, Prabhu (Apr 11)
- [no subject] alex (Apr 11)
- RE: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) alex (Apr 11)
- RE: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Vijay Gill (Apr 11)
- RE: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) alex (Apr 11)
- RE: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Vijay Gill (Apr 11)
- RE: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Vijay Gill (Apr 11)