RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>]

> From: Patrick Evans [mailto:pre () pre org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 10:22 AM

> On the flipside, who is actually less concerned about routing table
> size? The multihomed networks on the edges who can use a default if
> they want to, and are likely to be carrying less traffic and so have 
> more resources to deal with routing, or the core networks who have
> capacity problems of their own?

AFAICT, multi-homing doesn't work unless you also have dynamic routing. Is
this wrong?