nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting)
From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick () cybernothing org>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 22:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, David R. Conrad wrote:
With 15 POPs spread throughout the US and Europe, and more on the way, with exceedingly non-contiguous space obtained from 6 different upstreams, it would benefit ourselves as well as our many providers to have our own PI space.I suspect the number of organizations who can claim "it would benefit ourselves as well as our many providers" will greatly exceed the number of available routing slots before IPv6 comes anywhere close to being significantly deployed.
Gosh, doesn't that beg the question: why don't we require the return of all that wasted space that was delegated to anyone and everyone so long ago?
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) Patrick Greenwell (Aug 31)
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) Nathan Lane (Aug 31)
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) John Fraizer (Sep 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) Daniel Senie (Sep 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) Kim Hubbard (Sep 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) David R. Conrad (Sep 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) David R. Conrad (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) Masataka Ohta (Sep 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) David R. Conrad (Sep 01)
- RE: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) Christian Kuhtz (Sep 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) David R. Conrad (Sep 01)
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) David R. Conrad (Sep 01)