RE: netscan.org update

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () MHSC com>]

> From: Troy Davis [mailto:troy () nack net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 9:49 AM
>
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer <rmeyer () MHSC com> wrote:
>
> > I know that all of you are aware of this. Granted, each subsequently
> > smaller subnet also limits the maximum number of hosts that 
> will respond
> > to the smurf trigger. The point is that, the web-site ONLY 
> tests 0 and
>
> Actually, that's often not the case.  Through NAT and other modern
> marvels, it's possible to have massively overpopulated netblocks that
> all respond.  The largest amplifier we've found yet was 170,000x (on 
> a class C).

Thank you Troy, However my point remains.