nanog mailing list archives
Re: (O-T)
From: Dave McKay <dave () sneakerz org>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 16:02:35 -0500
Agreed, Please excuse my previous statement about level3 engineers. It was ment to be a private reply. (damn group reply!!) Its a personal opinion, and should be taken as such. (Its possible, and most likely true that l3 is a good provider, I just happened to speak with a not-so-bright engineer.) dan () netrail net (dan () netrail net) wrote:
I've found that the vast majority of very large ISPs have clueful engineers. Hoever, like many routing problems, it's not a question that a host exists, it's a question of reachability. Many times there are clueful engineers, but there are so many layers between them and customers, they are very hard to access. Daniel Golding Director of R&D "I'm not evil. I'm just drawn that way" NetRail, Inc. 1-888-NetRail On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Dave McKay wrote:Good connectivity, but clueless engineers. Problem solving is not their strong point. Stephen Burd (sburd () tm net) wrote:hey, can someone tell me what they know about Level 3 Communications please? rsvp privately thank you -Stephen-- Dave McKay dave () sneakerz org Network Engineer - Google Inc.
-- Dave McKay dave () sneakerz org Network Engineer - Google Inc.
Current thread:
- problems with uunet/worldcom/whoever-they-bought-this-week Jim Mercer (Sep 18)
- Re: problems with uunet/worldcom/whoever-they-bought-this-week Simon Lockhart (Sep 18)
- Re: problems with uunet/worldcom/whoever-they-bought-this-week John Fraizer (Sep 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: problems with uunet/worldcom/whoever-they-bought-this-week rdobbins (Sep 18)