nanog mailing list archives
RE: Confussion over multi-homing
From: Richard Welty <rwelty () vpnet com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:37:01 -0400
Wouldn't one of the ISPs have to advertise a longer prefix?
actually, to do it right, both have to advertise the longer prefix -- or more specifically, they have to both make holes in their filters permitting the multi-homed site to advertise them. this is what we're doing in our Troy, NY facility -- we have 2 upstreams, and we have a /24 from one of them, which both of them pass through. richard
Current thread:
- Confussion over multi-homing David Lott (Sep 14)
- Re: Confussion over multi-homing Geoffrey Zinderdine (Sep 14)
- Re: Confussion over multi-homing jlewis (Sep 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Confussion over multi-homing Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 14)
- RE: Confussion over multi-homing Tony Tauber (Sep 14)
- Re: Confussion over multi-homing Austin Schutz (Sep 15)
- RE: Confussion over multi-homing Tony Tauber (Sep 14)
- RE: Confussion over multi-homing Richard Welty (Sep 14)
- RE: Confussion over multi-homing Paul Froutan (Sep 14)
- Re: Confussion over multi-homing Brantley Jones (Sep 14)
- Re: Confussion over multi-homing dan (Sep 15)
- Re: Confussion over multi-homing Sean Donelan (Sep 14)
- Re: Confussion over multi-homing John Fraizer (Sep 14)
- Re: Confussion over multi-homing Patrick Evans (Sep 15)
- Re: Confussion over multi-homing John Fraizer (Sep 15)
- Re: Confussion over multi-homing John Fraizer (Sep 14)
- RE: Confussion over multi-homing Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 15)
- RE: Confussion over multi-homing Dmitri Krioukov (Sep 15)
- Re: Confussion over multi-homing David Lott (Sep 15)
- RE: Confussion over multi-homing Dmitri Krioukov (Sep 15)