nanog mailing list archives
Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation
From: Nathan Stratton <nathan () robotics net>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 11:28:36 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, M. David Leonard wrote:
I hate to sound stupid, but isn't this the "ILECs put CLECs out of business act?" Exactly how will this impact any ISP that uses the ILEC's facilities?
No way, I have helped setup 26 CLEC all over the US and I let every one of them know that they should not base their business on reciprocal compensation. There are still several ISPs that BUY PRIs from the ILECs, as a CLEC you can setup one-way trunking and not pay for all your incoming traffic.
<>
Nathan Stratton CTO, Exario Networks, Inc. nathan () robotics net nathan () exario net http://www.robotics.net http://www.exario.net
Current thread:
- HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation William Allen Simpson (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Jeff Mcadams (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation David Lesher (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation M. David Leonard (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Brett Frankenberger (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation M. David Leonard (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Bill Woodcock (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Nathan Stratton (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Brett Frankenberger (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Masataka Ohta (Sep 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Chip Sharp (Sep 14)
- Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation David Lesher (Sep 14)
- HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation Robert Cannon (Sep 18)