nanog mailing list archives
Re: router damaged by cracker?
From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 13:11:56 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Deepak Jain wrote:
By the way that article reads, I would guess the attack was not exceptionally sophisticated. (Everyone's definition of sophisticated is different). If one removed the config-reg (or renamed it) function on a small Cisco's firmware one could quite effectively change the passwords and make it difficult for a not very technical group of admins to take it back. Since there is talk about moving their main router behind a firewall, my guess is that they are using a routing appliance rather than any sophisticated routing hardware. The $18,000 replacement is probably for a different vendor, not because the hardware has lost function. This is all wild conjecture because I haven't seen any alerts from vendors in their normal channels. :) Deepak Jain AiNET
I would tend to agree.
From the DenverPost:
"Eagle Network, which has an environmental bent, services 100 Web sites and has 220 customers for its e-mail service, eagle-access.net." I feel bad for these folks. I don't know of many 25xx/26xx (guessing) based providers who keep hot-spares on site but I'm fairly certain that they could have obtained a temp-replacement router of nearly any make and configuration for the cost of shipping during that timespan. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc.
Current thread:
- router damaged by cracker? Kai Schlichting (Oct 12)
- Re: router damaged by cracker? Deepak Jain (Oct 12)
- Re: router damaged by cracker? John Fraizer (Oct 12)
- Re: router damaged by cracker? Deepak Jain (Oct 12)