nanog mailing list archives
Re: decreased caching efficiency?
From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:43:52 -0400 (EDT)
In general, I think that theyre are way too many web-developers out there who are ignorant of just how simple yet powerful the caching primitives in HTTP/1.1 are, and too many companies who are just interested in more damned traffic. :-) Adrian -- Adrian Chadd "It was then that I knew that I wouldn't <adrian () creative net au> die, as a doctor wouldn't fart in front of a dying boy." -- Angela's Ashes
Adrian, On this end of the pond, many of us measure success with MRTG and can very accurately plot profits using the same OIDs. You are absolutely right. When you're in the business of selling bandwidth, that is what you are interested in. Not being on the other end of a sat link helps I suppose. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
Current thread:
- decreased caching efficiency? Christian Kuhtz (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Adrian Chadd (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? John Fraizer (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Daniel Senie (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Patrick Greenwell (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Adrian Chadd (Oct 19)
- Message not available
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Adrian Chadd (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? John Fraizer (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Ian Cooper (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Adrian Chadd (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Andrew Bangs (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Andrew Bangs (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? John Fraizer (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? John Fraizer (Oct 20)