nanog mailing list archives
Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement
From: Alan Hannan <alan () mindvision com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:35:30 -0600
Sean's eloquent description of theory and science notwithstanding, I'd strongly encourage active network operators to experiment empirically with pchar on your internal links. Try it; you'll like it; and be blown away. The reported available bandwidth from a single, discrete, source, is scarily most always accurate, relative to pseudo real time exponentially decaying interface util and SNMP if utilization. -a Thus spake smd () clock org (smd () clock org) on or about Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:41:31PM -0800:
Mmm, network analysis stuff on NANOG. Scary!
[del]
Current thread:
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement, (continued)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement smd (Nov 29)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement Daniel Senie (Nov 29)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement Joel Jaeggli (Nov 29)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement Daniel Senie (Nov 29)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement smd (Nov 29)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement smd (Nov 29)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement David Charlap (Nov 29)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement smd (Nov 29)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement Kai Schlichting (Nov 29)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement smd (Nov 29)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement smd (Nov 29)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement Alan Hannan (Nov 30)
- Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement smd (Nov 29)