nanog mailing list archives
Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: 28 Nov 2000 04:41:38 -0800
On Mon, 27 November 2000, Allan Carscaddon wrote:
At 05:44 PM 11/27/00, Sean Donelan wrote:http://www.whatsdown.com/The proper address is http://whatsdown.net, although the performance of porn sites might be a leading indicator of network health ;-).
Just checking to see if people were awake! I think I received more mail about this error, than any other error I've made so far in my life. So much for my 99.999% typing accuracy. Yes, you are correct, the tld should be .net.
Current thread:
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic, (continued)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Shawn McMahon (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic hardie (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Bennett Todd (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Brian W. (Nov 27)
- RE: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Christian Kuhtz (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic Allan Carscaddon (Nov 27)
- Re: Limits of reliability or is 99.999999999% realistic David Charlap (Nov 28)