nanog mailing list archives

RE: good grief (RE: IPv4HT - Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label)


From: "Christian Kuhtz" <ck () arch bellsouth net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:36:17 -0500



Read the sig, Jim.

For all other product related questions, call 1-800-4-DOTNET.

--
Christian Kuhtz <ck () arch bellsouth net> -wk, <ck () gnu org> -hm
Sr. Architect, Engineering & Architecture, BellSouth.net, Atlanta, GA, U.S.
"I speak for myself only."

-----Original Message-----
From: JIM FLEMING [mailto:jfleming () anet com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 1:29 PM
To: Christian Kuhtz; nanog () nanog org
Cc: ipng () sunroof eng sun com
Subject: Re: good grief (RE: IPv4HT - Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label)


Thanks....

Just so we are clear, are you saying that it is a global Bell South policy
NOT to provide (clear-channel) (end-to-end) IPv4 TOS field transport ?
...IPv4HT

OR....are you saying that Bell South does provide IPv4HT, but a special
service
order is required ?...and additional costs ?

Lastly, if we look at the tiny, 32-bit, legacy IPv4 address space, can we
identify
blocks (ranges) of addresses which Bell South uses to provide IPv4HT ?

...if people routing IPv4HT traffic to Bell South, only route based on those
blocks, will
that be OK ?...

Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp

[.. noise removed ..]




Current thread: