nanog mailing list archives
Re: Trusting BGP sessions
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 19:52:35 +0800
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000, Sean Donelan wrote:
Question: historically have more routing snafus originated in "customer" BGP sessions or in "peer" BGP sessions?
Question: Historically have more routing snafus originated in filtered BGP sessions or in unfiltered BGP sessions? When I've been involved in network admin, filtering BGP sessions resulted in less headaches than unfiltered BGP sessions (one problem I did have was when I was being lazy with filtering and didn't require exact matches, and a few downstreams decided they wanted to deaggregate aggressively..) "Its too hard" doesn't cut it with me. I guess thats because I'm used to having to write RFC compliant code, and there's no "real" RFC compliance for configuration here.. 2c, Adrian -- Adrian Chadd "God: Damn! I left pot everywhere! <adrian () creative net au> Now I'll have to create Republicans!" - Bill Hicks
Current thread:
- Trusting BGP sessions Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions David Diaz (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions David Diaz (Nov 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Trusting BGP sessions Mark Borchers (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions Sean Donelan (Nov 14)
- Re: Trusting BGP sessions Adrian Chadd (Nov 15)
- [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) john heasley (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Kevin Oberman (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) john heasley (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) gerald (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) john heasley (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Ran Atkinson (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Howard C. Berkowitz (Nov 20)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) john heasley (Nov 20)