nanog mailing list archives
Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION
From: "Daniel L. Golding" <dan () netrail net>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 20:35:53 -0500 (EST)
That depends what you consider IOPS to be. Take your choice: a) Secret internet routing cabal. So secret, no one can figure out what they do. b) An antitrust suit just waiting to happen c) Nothing worth mentioning Take your pick. :) - Dan Golding On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, J Bacher wrote:
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Mark Mentovai wrote:Is there a consortium of big-time Internet operators? There should be -Preferably not to the exclusion of all others.
Current thread:
- MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION Sean Donelan (Nov 12)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION Mark Mentovai (Nov 12)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION J Bacher (Nov 13)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION Daniel L. Golding (Nov 13)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION David Diaz (Nov 13)
- NIC Handles Walters (Nov 14)
- Re: NIC Handles Steve Sobol (Nov 14)
- Re: NIC Handles Eric Whitehill (Nov 14)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION J Bacher (Nov 13)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION Mark Mentovai (Nov 12)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION John Fraizer (Nov 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION Sean Donelan (Nov 12)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION Mark Mentovai (Nov 12)
- Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION Sean Donelan (Nov 12)