nanog mailing list archives
RE: DoS issue, conclusion
From: Mathew Butler <mbutler () tonbu com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:26:24 -0800
Actually, this brings up an interesting point... what can one reasonably expect from an upstream provider to be put in the original service contract? Who has to pay for the time to resolve issues? What kinds of issues are normally part of the contract, and what kinds aren't? -Mat Butler -----Original Message----- From: Christian Nielsen [mailto:cnielsen () nielsen net] Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:18 PM To: Ariel Biener Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: DoS issue, conclusion On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Ariel Biener wrote:
3). Major Tier1 providers are either not represented on this list, or don't care.
not that... it is just that most ISPs dont have large staff to deal with these types of issues. And maybe, if you were being DoSed, and you offered to pay for their time, they might answer differently. Christian
Current thread:
- DoS issue, conclusion Ariel Biener (Nov 07)
- Re: DoS issue, conclusion Christian Nielsen (Nov 07)
- Re: DoS issue, conclusion Steven J. Sobol (Nov 07)
- Re: DoS issue, conclusion Ariel Biener (Nov 07)
- Re: DoS issue, conclusion Steven J. Sobol (Nov 07)
- Re: DoS issue, conclusion Steven J. Sobol (Nov 07)
- Re: DoS issue, conclusion Christian Nielsen (Nov 07)
- Message not available
- Re: DoS issue, conclusion Ben Browning (Nov 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: DoS issue, conclusion Mathew Butler (Nov 07)
- Re: DoS issue, conclusion Sean Donelan (Nov 07)
- Re: DoS issue, conclusion Pim van Riezen (Nov 07)
- Re: DoS issue, conclusion Marshall Eubanks (Nov 08)