nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGPs and services?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 02:39:45 -0400
On Tue, 16 May 2000 23:22:09 PDT, "Roeland M.J. Meyer" said:
What is the general feeling about running routing protocols on web/dns/mail servers?Technically, not a problem. However, there is a school of thought that thinks that to be a bad policy. That routing functions should be on appliance-level systems, like routers. There is also some merit in that appliances are more reliable, mainly because nothing *else* can cause an operational interrupt. Unix systems are *real* good about process control. but, there are still some things that makes it advisable to reboot a system, at times. If that system is ALSO a critical router then the entire net is down until the reboot is complete. It is generally not
How about the case of a system with several network interfaces on different subnets, and using a routing protocol to better pick which interface to send a connection out on? This is probably more applicable to mail servers - web and dns servers don't have as much latitude as they sort of have to answer on the interface they were contacted on... Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
Current thread:
- IGPs and services? nicholas harteau (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? ww (May 16)
- RE: IGPs and services? Roeland M.J. Meyer (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? R.P. Aditya (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? nicholas harteau (May 17)
- RE: IGPs and services? jlewis (May 17)
- Re: IGPs and services? Bryan C. Andregg (May 18)
- Re: IGPs and services? jlewis (May 18)
- Re: IGPs and services? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 18)
- Re: IGPs and services? Brandon Ross (May 18)
- Re: IGPs and services? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 19)
- Re: IGPs and services? Stephen Sprunk (May 19)
- Re: IGPs and services? Neil J. McRae (May 19)
- RE: IGPs and services? Roeland M.J. Meyer (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? ww (May 16)