nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNET outage in Palo Alto
From: "Sehmel, William C." <bsehmel () narrows com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 19:14:12 -0700
I would have to agree with John on this one. I do not look at Randy Bush's comments any more serious then I do to "garlic's". Actually Garlic's might have something interesting in them. Name's don't matter in my opinion. Bill Sehmel Sr. Network Engineer OpalNetworks, INC bsehmel () opalnetworks com ***<john fraizer> wrote ****
Susan, Some of us don't have the luxury of living under the veil of academia and as such, use "alternate" email accounts when posting information that while ON-TOPIC and of OPERATIONAL use, may cause significant political fallout. It might not fit the AUP. So be it. It was significantly above the typical S:N ratio for the list and as such, I believe that YOU are out of line in chastising the individual in question. If you don't like my particular opinion on the subject, please take it up with those in my company who have the powers to make my job go away. --- John Fraizer Founder and CEO EnterZone, Inc
Current thread:
- UUNET outage in Palo Alto Garlic (May 09)
- Re: UUNET outage in Palo Alto Christian Nielsen (May 09)
- Re: UUNET outage in Palo Alto Susan R. Harris (May 09)
- Re: UUNET outage in Palo Alto John Fraizer (May 09)
- Re: UUNET outage in Palo Alto Sehmel, William C. (May 09)
- Born identity? Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 10)
- Re: Born identity? hardie (May 10)
- Re: UUNET outage in Palo Alto John Fraizer (May 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UUNET outage in Palo Alto Garlic (May 09)
- Re: UUNET outage in Palo Alto Danny McPherson (May 09)
- Re: UUNET outage in Palo Alto Bill Woodcock (May 09)
- Re: UUNET outage in Palo Alto Wolfgang Henke (May 10)