nanog mailing list archives
RE: Re: product liability (was: Virus Update)
From: "Roeland Meyer (E-mail)" <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 15:17:34 -0700
I guess that they've fullfilled theor promise now, don't you? There is very little training time necessary to write such code for Windoze. <grin>
Shawn McMahon: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 2:45 PM On Tue, 9 May 2000, Jim Mercer wrote:it is not enough to say that people don't have time to readand/or patch their systems.that is like saying that there is no time to train schoolbus drivers, just send them out to pick up our kids.
You're talking about a product sold under the advertising promise that little to no training is necessary, and with default behavior that makes it TRIVIAL to write crap like this. Not just possible; not even easy, but TRIVIAL. Any high school kid with a couple of "Idiots Guide to Visual Basic in 21 Days for Dummies" books under his belt could have written this, and if he'd had a class on programming he'd have written better code than this piece of crap.
Current thread:
- Re: product liability (was: Virus Update) Jim Mercer (May 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: product liability (was: Virus Update) Owen DeLong (May 09)
- Re: product liability (was: Virus Update) Stephen Kowalchuk (May 09)
- Re: product liability (was: Virus Update) Andrew Brown (May 09)
- Re: product liability (was: Virus Update) Daniel Senie (May 09)
- Re: product liability (was: Virus Update) Stephen Kowalchuk (May 09)
- Re: Re: product liability (was: Virus Update) Shawn McMahon (May 09)
- Re: Re: product liability (was: Virus Update) Jim Mercer (May 09)
- RE: Re: product liability (was: Virus Update) Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 09)