nanog mailing list archives
Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 16:25:42 -0700
Hop-by-hop routing is on its way out....and not soon enough.
Worked fine for the last 20 years. Can you substantiate your assertion? So far all alternatives were shown to bring more problems than improvements.
As for reinventing the virtual circuit, I don't think we can get much lower than this.
I hate to reiterate the obvious, but VCs and global dynamically routed networks don't mix well. --vadim
Current thread:
- Optical Crossconnects and IP Bora Akyol (May 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Vadim Antonov (May 08)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Tony Mumm (May 08)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP smd (May 08)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Howard C. Berkowitz (May 08)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP David Diaz (May 08)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Howard C. Berkowitz (May 08)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Vadim Antonov (May 08)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Tony Mumm (May 09)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Craig Partridge (May 09)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Tony Mumm (May 09)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Tony Li (May 09)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Bora Akyol (May 09)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Thomas P. Brisco (May 09)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Wayne Bouchard (May 09)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Tony Li (May 09)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Bora Akyol (May 09)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Vadim Antonov (May 11)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Alex Bligh (May 11)
- Re: Optical Crossconnects and IP Tony Li (May 11)
(Thread continues...)