Re: Cisco's CNR vs ISC Bind/DHCP

[brett watson <bwatson () mibh net>]

> Fletcher writes:
> > From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred () sss1 gwi net>
> > To: nanog () merit edu
> > CC: gwi-network () sss1 gwi net
> > Subject: Cisco's CNR vs ISC Bind/DHCP
> > Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 17:02:37 -0500
> >
> > We are working here with the hypothesis that Cisco's CNR product is a
> > lamer and inferior in quality to the Internet Software Consortium's
> > open source DNS and DHCP software.  Is this a generally accepted
> > hypothesis, or are we off in the weeds (again) by ourselves on this
> > one?
> >
> > thanks!
> > fletcher
>
> Well, Fletcher, considering that you probably don't know anything about the 
> product, do you really feel it necessary to publicly bash it?  On what 
> information to you base your bold assertion?

one would hope that cisco licensed the core code for this from Nominum
(www.nominum.com).  i don't consider application/software development
to be cisco's "thing".

-b