nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming?
From: Andrew Bender <abender () tns-inc com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 09:53:58 -0500
Marc Slemko wrote:
This will normally be a caching nameserver that may or may not be the same as the nameservers for the domain. In theory, it should be "close" to the client network wise for other reasons. Is it always? No. But it is a more reasonable metric.
Have any substantive empirical studies been perfromed that validate this assumption? The degree to which it is true seems to be the gating factor for the effectiveness of this method... Andrew Bender tns-inc.com
Current thread:
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming?, (continued)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? BrandonButterworth (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Randy Bush (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Alex Bligh (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Randy Bush (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Patrick Evans (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Gary E. Miller (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Andrew Bender (Mar 15)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Mr. James W. Laferriere (Mar 15)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? k claffy (Mar 15)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Chris Cappuccio (Mar 15)
- P[ath]char (Was Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming?) Mr. James W. Laferriere (Mar 16)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Mr. James W. Laferriere (Mar 15)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? BrandonButterworth (Mar 14)