nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming?
From: "Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen" <ncbp () bank-pedersen dk>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 17:39:24 +0100
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 05:42:04PM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Radware has a product called Linkproof and claims that it negates the need for BGP-4 and portable IP addresses: http://www.radware.com/product/lproof/Default.htm
This is kinda funny: "LinkProof's simplicity and fault tolerance features enable ISPs to introduce redundant Internet access to new and existing clients. It provides a simple, seamless solution for ISPs who want to upgrade their sites to multiple links without deploying and maintaining advanced proprietary routing protocols." Now, where is the proprietary in BGP4 as opposed to LinkProof. Just wondering. /Niels Chr. -- Niels Christian Bank-Pedersen, NCB1-RIPE. Network Manager, Tele Danmark NET, IP-section. "Hey, are any of you guys out there actually *using* RFC 2549?"
Current thread:
- Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Hank Nussbacher (Mar 01)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen (Mar 01)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Scott W Brim (Mar 01)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? David Israel (Mar 01)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Alex Pilosov (Mar 01)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Paul Vixie (Mar 01)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Peter A. van Oene (Mar 12)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Ehud Gavron (Mar 12)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Chris Brenton (Mar 12)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Peter A. van Oene (Mar 12)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Dana Hudes (Mar 12)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Daniel Senie (Mar 12)