![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: New York City: ATT Local Service (TCG)
From: John Fraizer <nanog () EnterZone Net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 01:32:43 -0400 (EDT)
Reminds me of my days in Cellular. We were the alpha-test site for the Motorola EMX-2500. Every time MOT would come up with a fix for something, we would have to (by contract) re-sysgen the switch and as result, we lost ALL customer features (any call forwarding, pager options, etc). It was nasty but, somehow, the company (and you know who you are) managed to sell itself to a sucker...er...some other cellular carrier for a profit. All in all, total switch crashes are a bad thing. --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Nathan Stratton wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Wayne Bouchard wrote:Sounds like a switch somewhere lost some or all of its configuration.. This could take a while.Just this CO, if it is not it may be a STP issue.<>Nathan Stratton CTO, eXario Networks, Inc. nathan () robotics net nathan () exario net http://www.robotics.net http://www.exario.net
Current thread:
- New York City: ATT Local Service (TCG) Sean Donelan (Jun 28)
- Re: New York City: ATT Local Service (TCG) Kai Schlichting (Jun 28)
- Re: New York City: ATT Local Service (TCG) Kai Schlichting (Jun 28)
- Re: New York City: ATT Local Service (TCG) Wayne Bouchard (Jun 28)
- Re: New York City: ATT Local Service (TCG) Nathan Stratton (Jun 28)
- Re: New York City: ATT Local Service (TCG) John Fraizer (Jun 28)
- Re: New York City: ATT Local Service (TCG) Kai Schlichting (Jun 28)
- Re: New York City: ATT Local Service (TCG) Charles Sprickman (Jun 28)
- Re: New York City: ATT Local Service (TCG) Kai Schlichting (Jun 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New York City: ATT Local Service (TCG) Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 28)