nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using RPSL in real life with the IRR's
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:00:38 -0700
most providers which use the irr see it as how one publishes the parts of one's routing policy one needs to make public, i.e. what one's peers need to filter prefixe announcements, that and no more. so basically, the list of prifixes for an origin is needed, and to which ass one provides transit. (some see even this as too much to reveal publicly) all the rest is cruft for configuring one's own routers, which one likely does not wish to publish and which one manages internally. i believe the rpsl project feels that providers will use private rpsl databases and the tools the rpsl folk make available to configure their routers. i am not aware of tier one provicers which do so. small and medium providers may, hence this would be useful. so the jury is still out on most of the rpsl syntax. if you don't need it, ignore it. randy
Current thread:
- Using RPSL in real life with the IRR's Julian Eccli (Jun 26)
- Re: Using RPSL in real life with the IRR's gerald (Jun 26)
- Message not available
- Re: Using RPSL in real life with the IRR's Michael Shields (Jun 26)
- Message not available
- Re: Using RPSL in real life with the IRR's gerald (Jun 26)
- Re: Using RPSL in real life with the IRR's Jeff Haas (Jun 26)
- Re: Using RPSL in real life with the IRR's Randy Bush (Jun 26)