nanog mailing list archives
Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering
From: Michael Shields <shields () msrl com>
Date: 23 Jun 2000 17:02:17 +0000
In article <200006230005.SAA11801 () tcb net>, Danny McPherson <danny () tcb net> wrote:
It's interesting that for quite a while nearly 30K PSTN 800 numbers were allocated nearly every week, with number portability and all. Perhaps we're simply missing something :-)
As has been observed many times on NANOG, one of the advantages that a circuit-switched network like the PSTN has over a packet-switched network like the Internet is that the PSTN has leisurely call setup times and relatively infrequent routing table lookups. No long-distance carrier processes even 100 million phone calls in a day networkwide; yet there are many routers which process billions of packets daily *per interface*. -- Shields.
Current thread:
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering, (continued)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering John Fraizer (Jun 22)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Danny McPherson (Jun 22)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Jeff Haas (Jun 23)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Mark Borchers (Jun 23)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Jeff Haas (Jun 23)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Mark Prior (Jun 25)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Dana Hudes (Jun 25)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Joe Provo - Network Architect (Jun 25)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Jeff Haas (Jun 23)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering John Fraizer (Jun 23)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Michael Shields (Jun 23)