nanog mailing list archives
Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering
From: Austin Schutz <tex () off org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:31:41 -0700
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 03:29:19PM +0100, Randy Bush wrote:
the problem is that routers will not run acls of the size needed to filter large peers were they to register. so why should i whine at them to register.
AS Path filtering would be much smaller than prefix based filtering. Perhaps small enough to work on existing routers. These filters could also be built using registry data, from the ASes that make up providers' as-macros. Not a silver bullet, but probably significantly better than doing nothing. Austin
Current thread:
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering, (continued)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Jeff Haas (Jun 20)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Sean Donelan (Jun 20)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Jared Mauch (Jun 20)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering jhsu (Jun 20)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering bmanning (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering jhsu (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Randy Bush (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering bmanning (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering jhsu (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Austin Schutz (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering cengiz (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Austin Schutz (Jun 21)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering gerald (Jun 22)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering John Fraizer (Jun 22)
- Re: using IRR tools for BGP route filtering Jeff Haas (Jun 23)