nanog mailing list archives
RE: maximum active vlans in a crisco 6509
From: "Roeland Meyer (E-mail)" <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 20:01:45 -0700
Bob Biver: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 7:28 PM the docs say max 250, is this informational or a limit of spanning tree? also, is anyone running more than 250 ?
If I recall correctly, that's also real close to the maximum number of physical connections to the chasis, with all modules installed. Personally, I've never run anywhere near that number. I don't think it is useful to have less than 2 members in a vlan. You would also be surpassing the bandwidth limitations of that chasis, even if all the connections were 100baseTX.
Current thread:
- maximum active vlans in a crisco 6509 Bob Biver (Jun 20)
- RE: maximum active vlans in a crisco 6509 Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (Jun 20)
- Re: maximum active vlans in a crisco 6509 Bennett Todd (Jun 20)
- Re: maximum active vlans in a crisco 6509 Bora Akyol (Jun 20)
- Re: maximum active vlans in a crisco 6509 Bennett Todd (Jun 20)
- Re: maximum active vlans in a crisco 6509 Jeff Kell (Jun 20)
- Re: maximum active vlans in a crisco 6509 Bennett Todd (Jun 20)
- Re: maximum active vlans in a crisco 6509 Stephen Sprunk (Jun 21)
- RE: maximum active vlans in a crisco 6509 Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (Jun 20)
- Re: maximum active vlans in a crisco 6509 Devin P. Anderson (Jun 21)