nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sonet protection usage
From: Danny McPherson <danny () tcb net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 22:43:10 -0600
I should clarify. The "ADM trib" I'm referring to here is when the transmission gear (ADM) is located in the same facility as the routers and local loops are a non-issue. As for two local loops w/APS, one protecting the other, there are certainly precautions that can be taken to avoid a great deal of the problems that folks have shared here over the years, some obvious some not. But simply handing over another $100K for a second port, simply to protect against router failures, isn't always a sensible .. or viable option. -danny
Current thread:
- Re: Sonet protection usage, (continued)
- Re: Sonet protection usage William Allen Simpson (Jul 25)
- Re: Sonet protection usage Bora Akyol (Jul 25)
- Re: Sonet protection usage William Allen Simpson (Jul 26)
- Re: Sonet protection usage William Allen Simpson (Jul 26)
- Re: Sonet protection usage Steve Meuse (Jul 26)
- Re: Sonet protection usage Neil J. McRae (Jul 26)
- Re: Sonet protection usage Jonathon Plonka (Jul 26)
- Re: Sonet protection usage William Allen Simpson (Jul 25)
- Re: Sonet protection usage Ron da Silva (Jul 25)
- Re: Sonet protection usage William Allen Simpson (Jul 26)
- Re: Sonet protection usage William Allen Simpson (Jul 26)