nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 1918
From: ww () shadowfax styx org
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:11:58 -0400
"Stephen" == Stephen Kowalchuk <skowalchuk () diamonex com> writes:
Stephen> Public IP address allocation from ARIN is a totally Stephen> different matter. If people need assign addresses to things, they're going to do it. If certain bureaucracies prevent them from doing it the correct way, they'll do it the incorrect way, which is what we're discussing here. Stephen> My point is that filtering RFC 1918 Stephen> addresses at your network's borders is the right thing to Stephen> do for a number of reasons. Which is good in theory, but sometimes is not possible. Up untill very recently a router did not exist that could actually do this when a significant amount of traffic is being pushed through it. Cheers, -w -- Will Waites \________ ww () shadowfax styx org\____________________________ Idiosyntactix Ministry of Research and Development\
Current thread:
- RE: RFC 1918, (continued)
- RE: RFC 1918 rdobbins (Jul 16)
- Re: RFC 1918 Bohdan Tashchuk (Jul 16)
- Re: RFC 1918 Greg A. Woods (Jul 16)
- Re: RFC 1918 John Fraizer (Jul 17)
- Re: RFC 1918 Stephen Kowalchuk (Jul 17)
- Re: RFC 1918 ww (Jul 17)
- Re: RFC 1918 Eric A. Hall (Jul 17)
- Re: RFC 1918 ww (Jul 17)
- Re: RFC 1918 Scott McGrath (Jul 18)
- Re: RFC 1918 Stephen Kowalchuk (Jul 17)
- Re: RFC 1918 ww (Jul 17)
- Re: RFC 1918 Eric A. Hall (Jul 18)
- Filtering (was Re: RFC 1918) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 18)
- Re: Filtering (was Re: RFC 1918) Paul Vixie (Jul 19)
- Re: RFC 1918 Eric A. Hall (Jul 18)
- Re: RFC 1918 Bill Fumerola (Jul 18)
- Re: RFC 1918 Shawn McMahon (Jul 19)