nanog mailing list archives
RE: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst
From: "Eyers, Jerry" <Jerry.Eyers () priceline com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:19:59 -0400
Unless you have a monopoly (hence the previous poster's comment). I personally have seen the "we are a monopoly, you get the bandwidth we dictate to you, not what you paid for" mentality in operation in my local area DSL provider, after they changed bandwidth on my service three times (always down, go figure). Jerry -----Original Message----- From: Bob Biver [mailto:bbiver () hotmail com] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 10:49 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: RE: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst Addendum-- To to overwhelming responce: I was simply trying to get a perspective on shaping PPPoE traffic. I would *NEVER* misinform or otherwise attempt to defraud anyone. The account would simply be cheaper than one that was advertised as full bandwidth. This account would be put out there so that *everyone* would know what they were buying 320K down with a 16K CIR up but burstable to 128. Sorry for the confusion- Bob- PS Why does everyone think poeple are trying to 'rip" off customers? you will not stay in business or in your job long if you do that. ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
Current thread:
- DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst Bob Biver (Jul 12)
- Re: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst Simon Lockhart (Jul 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst John Fraizer (Jul 13)
- RE: DNS for interfaces & PPPoE Time Burst Eyers, Jerry (Jul 14)