nanog mailing list archives
RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron
From: "Sutantyo, Danny" <danny.sutantyo () intel com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:21:00 -0700
Someone from the maker of BIND company for DNS came here, and he told us that he's using OSPF to load balance the server, I don't know how he did it. Unless he's using the small routers to do it for servers. -----Original Message----- From: tony bourke [mailto:tony () vegan net] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 9:12 AM To: Sutantyo, Danny Cc: lb-l () vegan net; nanog () merit edu Subject: RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Hi Danny, I'm not sure what you mean. Are you talking about load balancing routers? Or load balancing output from load balancers? Tony On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Sutantyo, Danny wrote:
How about load balancing on the router? Any idea? I heard someone is using ospf method to load balance? -----Original Message----- From: tony bourke [mailto:tony () vegan net] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 8:57 AM To: Roeland M.J. Meyer Cc: 'Sutantyo, Danny'; lb-l () vegan net; nanog () merit edu Subject: RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron True, thats why I don't particularly like LocalDirectors. Most of the other load balancing solutions do offer GigE, however. I prefer LB over clustering as it gives you more flexibility in what you use as far as your platform. Microsoft's clustering software limits you to microsoft, while I'm not sure if resonate will let you do both UNIX and Windows. The implementation is alot simpler as well, the LB is bascially acting as a glorified router in most cases, so its a very logical and elegant solutions. Clustering, at least in my experience, tends to be more combersome and complex to setup. But that is just my humble opinion. LB vs Clustering sounds like a possible religeous debate ;) Tony On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:Yeah, so why bother? As long as load balancers don't have GigE ports, I can't use them and have to use something like Resonate. Besides, LBs don't do site-site load balancing. If you want to do distributed load sharing then there really isn't much choice. Personally, I don't see benefits of LBs that proper clustering wont give you. Component clusters work well, much better than simple LB will give you.From: tony bourke: Friday, July 07, 2000 8:01 AM you can do EtherChannel for more than 100 Mbps, but we all know how well that works. Tony On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:The last time I looked at one, I couldn't get it in GigE...100baseTX only. Ergo, I couldn't run it on mybackbone.Sutantyo, Danny: Thursday, July 06, 2000 8:37 AM How about Local Director? From: Richard Colella: Thursday, July 06, 2000 5:38
AM
Products are also available from Alteon, Cisco (Distributed Director) and Resonate. Last time I looked, none of these products does everything one wants, IMHO, but the set union of features comes pretty close.-------------- -- ---- ---- --- - - - - - -- - - - - - - Tony Bourke tony () vegan net
-------------- -- ---- ---- --- - - - - - -- - - - - - - Tony Bourke tony () vegan net
Current thread:
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Cisco LocalDirector, (continued)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Cisco LocalDirector Stephen Sprunk (Jul 07)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Cisco LocalDirector Roeland M.J. Meyer (Jul 08)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Cisco LocalDirector Adam Rothschild (Jul 08)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Cisco LocalDirector Stephen Sprunk (Jul 07)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Karyn Ulriksen (Jul 06)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: 3DNS / DDirector kevin graham (Jul 06)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Karyn Ulriksen (Jul 06)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Dmitri Krioukov (Jul 06)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Sutantyo, Danny (Jul 07)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Sutantyo, Danny (Jul 07)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron tony bourke (Jul 07)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Sutantyo, Danny (Jul 07)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Stephen Stuart (Jul 07)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron John Hall (Jul 10)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Stephen Stuart (Jul 07)