nanog mailing list archives
Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion)
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 15:39:20 -0800
On 01/31/00, dave o'leary <doleary () juniper net> wrote:
Attempts to "standardize" inter-NOC communication happened a couple of times in the early 90's in the IETF, but it got too ugly, with too many barriers (basically people not wanting to expose dirty laundry). I fear that attempts to do so now when the providers are *really* competing with each other (as opposed to back in the old daze when we were all friends :-) will suffer the same fate, other than on a pairwise basis between NOCs that cooperate well with each other anyway.
Those of us who are willing to communicate with each other should go ahead and write up a BCP, because the folks who're scared to admit that they're fallible won't follow it anyway. ---------========== J.D. Falk <jdfalk () cybernothing org> =========--------- | "One computer is a problem. A computer network is a large problem. | | The internet is the world's largest problem." | | -- Douglas Warren | ----========== http://www.cybernothing.org/jdfalk/home.html ==========----
Current thread:
- Definition of Congestion Sean Donelan (Jan 30)
- Re: Definition of Congestion Sean Butler (Jan 30)
- Re: Definition of Congestion Sam Thomas (Jan 30)
- Re: Definition of Congestion Henry R. Linneweh (Jan 30)
- inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) dave o'leary (Jan 31)
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) J.D. Falk (Jan 31)
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) Paul Vixie (Jan 31)
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) Steve Meuse (Jan 31)
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) Deepak Jain (Jan 31)