nanog mailing list archives
Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations
From: Steve Rubin <ser () tch org>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 23:58:44 -0800
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 12:37:32AM -0700, John M. Brown wrote:
so I decided to poke around some more... I really can't see how the argument of ""Route / AS-Path" table bloat is going to break things if ARIN starts doing mico-allocations for providers that need to multi-home, but don't need tons of space. I really like the /30's, /32's...
[routes deleted] I take it you get transit from the network formerly known as iMCI as from what I can tell, it looks like they don't send these routes to peers. I'd be willing to bet this is a knob they can turn off for you if you don't want to see the routes... Or you can just install some sanity filtering on your inbound peers/transit providers to nuke the /25 and up's. Then again, like Patrick, I have no enable, so what do I know? :-) -- Steve Rubin * ser () tch org * http://www.tch.org/~ser/
Current thread:
- More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations John M. Brown (Feb 18)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations Steve Rubin (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations John M. Brown (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations I Am Not An Isp (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations Ulf Zimmermann (Feb 22)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations NANOG Mailing List (Feb 22)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations John M. Brown (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations Steve Rubin (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations I Am Not An Isp (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations John M. Brown (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations jmalcolm (Feb 20)
- Odd problem on very old Cisco ios (OT) Mr. James W. Laferriere (Feb 20)
- Re: Odd problem on very old Cisco ios (OT) jlewis (Feb 20)